The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but the constructs of the scale have not. Mult Scler. Apr;22(5) doi: / Epub Jul The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure of. PDF | On Jan 4, , Craig Andrew Jackson and others published The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11).

Author: Shakora Gugor
Country: Antigua & Barbuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 21 May 2015
Pages: 361
PDF File Size: 3.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.43 Mb
ISBN: 650-4-92290-686-4
Downloads: 68387
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zologrel

Chalder fatigue scale – MEpedia

The sub-scales of physical and psychological fatigue are not used here, but rather the respondent receives a global binary fatigue score ranging from 0 to It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Exploring the validity of the Chalder Fatigue Scale fatiigue chronic fatigue syndrome. Fatigue in the general Norwegian population: Reliability coefficients for the CFQ 11 have been high in studies of CFS patients [ 5 ] as well as occupational and general population research, ranging from 0. Email alerts New issue alert. Loneliness and social isolation of military veterans: Effects of cognitive loading fagigue force on upper trapezius fatigue. The CFQ measuring a composite of physical and mental fatigue severity i.

Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11) | Occupational Medicine | Oxford Academic

Discovery and identification of fatigue-related biomarkers in human saliva. Sign In or Create an Account. Fatigue is one of the most distressing symptoms of multiple sclerosis MS. The Likert scoring system allows for means and distributions to be calculated for both the global total as well as the two sub-scales. More on this topic The psychological and physiological health effects of fatigue. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.

To evaluate the psychometric properties of an item fatigue severity measure, the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire CFQ in MS including validity of the factor structure, internal reliability, discriminant validity and sensitivity to change. Another advantage is that the CFQ 11 is used widely in occupational research and allows for straightforward comparisons between studies and populations.


Physician gender differences in processing surgical risk features in videos of standardized patients. The CFQ 11 has been used widely in studies ascertaining tiredness among working populations as well as patient groups and consistently fares extremely well against other longer and multidimensional tools [ 6 ].

The need for a reliable self-completion tool that can measure this subjective condition, either in extreme clinical cases or in routine day-to-day functioning, has never been greater [ 3 ].

Questionnaire Reviews All Journals search input. Fagigue 1 was correlated with subjective everyday cognitive difficulties, concentration difficulties, and a deficit in paired associate learning.

Exploring the validity of the Chalder Fatigue scale in chronic fatigue syndrome.

Factor 2 was correlated with difficulties in maintaining sleep. For all items, the least symptomatic answers are on the left of the response-set, quuestionnaire an easy-to-understand checklist for respondents. Related articles in Web of Science Google Scholar.

For Permissions, please email: The Questionhaire Scale, sometimes referred to as the Chalder Fatigue Scale the CFQ—to differentiate it from chronic fatigue syndrome or CFSis a self-administered questionnaire for measuring the extent and severity of fatigue within both clinical and non-clinical, epidemiological populations.

Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Factor 3 was inversely correlated with grip strength, peak VO2, peak heart rate, and chaldee functional work capacity. Tiredness and fatigue are important in both academic and applied occupational medicine—and the understanding of the link between them and employee health, performance, safety and general workability continues to grow. Sensitization in the UK Supreme Court.

The global score also spans two dimensions—physical fatigue measured by items 1—7 and psychological fatigue qkestionnaire by items 8— The results support the validity of mental and physical fatigue subscales and the dropping of the “loss of interest” item in the item version of the fatigue scale. Factor 4 was correlated with interview and self-rated measures of depression.


chalder fatigue questionnaire

Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Assessment of fatigue among working people: The CFQ had high internal consistency, showed small questtionnaire moderate correlations with impact of fatigue and mood, and was sensitive to change across low and high intensity behavioural interventions. Association of quality of life with disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer: We examined the constructs of the item fatigue scale in a sample of chronic fatigue syndrome patients through principal components analysis, followed by correlations with measures of subjective and objective cognitive performance, physiological measures of strength and functional work capacity, depression, anxiety, and subjective sleep difficulties.

Data analysis included confirmatory factor analysis to determine the factor structure and model fit, correlations to assess discriminant validity and effects sizes to determine sensitivity to change. Citing articles via Web of Science Predictors of fatigue and work ability in cancer survivors. Using the Likert scoring method, responses on the extreme left receive a score of 0, increasing to 1, 2 or 3 as they auestionnaire more symptomatic. Measuring MS fatigue poses a number of challenges.

As a short questionnaire, phrased in simple English with a straightforward answering system, it provides a brief tool to measure both physical and psychological fatigue. Post-traumatic growth in ex- military personnel: A bi-factor model with one general fatigue factor, incorporating two smaller group factors mental and physical fatigue had good model fit and appeared the most appropriate factor structure underlying the CFQ scale.

The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but cahlder constructs of the scale have not been examined in this patient sample.